i donno leh
feel like taking cardiff fun bet
same here. i read new paper brian miller say take cardiff fun bet. how about the italian or spanish league?
brian miller spot on for the uefa cup
err spanish league no use leh, nuttin to play for
italian league... u fancy inter to lose the title ?
inter might cock the game up. parma sure give gd fight. how abt barca? spanish n italian last match of season paper say
barca still gt wat to play ?
ya last game of the season liao
http://youtube.com/watch?v=jGMi_AnMTxU
makes your hair stand. watch it! :D
Originally posted by felirox:http://youtube.com/watch?v=jGMi_AnMTxU
makes your hair stand. watch it! :D
kinda sad but as a whole,i feel gunners play the most attractive football comparing to those teams who only depend on certain players, play boring football, or depend on defenders on counter attack style of football.
but where r the trophies?
Originally posted by bryanw:but where r the trophies?
next season. tis season suay becos we were robbed by english referee n injuries.
if next season no trophies how? we not interested in pussy carling cup of fa cup. we want the champions league.
i believe we can! we were so close tis season if not for those scum referees n official who trying to stop us by giving us countless unfavourable decision.
also bear in mind our squad r still young n not able to handle pressure n mind game easily.
honestly speaking our squad is not young if u really look at the ages. if like 23 n below considered young. n young cannot b used as an excuse forever. rooney n ronaldo also young. n we cant always complain abt ref decisions. cos there were times the ref was leinent to us in certain games i believe. n nobody ask wenger to buy young players. if the arsenal academy cant produce standard quality players, they should not be allowed to play in arsenal matches. if wenger was elsewhere like barca, already sure sacked.
dat's where u r wrong, my friend. the average age in arsenal is indeed young comparing to the bunch of scums.
it's not dat wenger not buying quality players, but can the club really afford it? n bear in mind Arsenal is not really establish club comparing to barca or milan, where most players will love to go.
n i still think we were targetted by the english. how many free-kicks or penalties were giving to us? why were the FA not taking charge on a player who cause career ending to our player? the worst things r some of our players were suspended after the matches.
comparing to Faggotson who was treated like king of england n let go from many charges, tis BPL is really kelong!
n honestly, flamini has the right to go. if arsenal want quality they should pay for it. u cannot pay peanuts and expect quality in return. furthermore flamini already proved himself in the season. since arsenal refuse to pay flamini what he wants, flamini goes. a football career is short. mid 30s must retire. flamini needs to eat. it is wenger who is stingy n calculating with flamini. flamini is not a dog. he fill in the role beside fabregas proving himself.
honestly if flamini stayed and got 55k a wk, how would he feel since fabregas is offered so much more. wenger was right to ask flamini to prove himself. n flamini did it. but where is the improved contract. if wenger really value flamini he would agree to flamini terms. n 60k a wk is not alot for flamini standard. it is wenger who thinks that anybody can leave he is the boss. thats y all our superstars viera, henry, parlour, keown left cos wenger think he can replace anybody.
bear in mind dat flamini only play well in his last season comparing to his four season stints. if he is really dat good, we could have won the title already.
it's him to make such decision to leave. it's a pity he don't share the boss's vision. arsenal survive as a team n somemore his position can be replaceable.
those who walk off of gunners, how many done well outside? in my book only one holland player (bronk-whatever) done well in barca, the rest either play as reserve n not doing well comparing to their peak form at gunners.
here r the ages
diaby 23. sagna 25. fabregas 21. toure 27. senderos 23. rosicky 28. eduardo 25. gallas 31. van persie 25. hleb 27. denilson 20. song 21. gilberto 32. djourou 21. clichy 23. almunia 31. adebayor 24. bendtner 20. eboue 25. hoyte 24. traore 19. walcot 19.
out of 22 1st team players, 10 (almost half) are 25 and above. it is not considered young.
Originally posted by 798:bear in mind dat flamini only play well in his last season comparing to his four season stints. if he is really dat good, we could have won the title already.
it's him to make such decision to leave. it's a pity he don't share the boss's vision. arsenal survive as a team n somemore his position can be replaceable.
those who walk off of gunners, how many done well outside? in my book only one holland player (bronk-whatever) done well in barca, the rest either play as reserve n not doing well comparing to their peak form at gunners.
we cannot expect flamini to do everything. flamini only 24yrs old n already improved alot. the oldies cant even win the title. henry cant even captain arsenal to the champions league trophy, what more flamini.
i did my calculation, the average age is below 25 what?
anyway u took dat shitty article from a forum which is so against gunners?
what shitty article? i took the ages from the arsenal website.
apparently i got called back from work to inform that there was a conflict in my precious crapbox
Originally posted by 798:i did my calculation, the average age is below 25 what?
anyway u took dat shitty article from a forum which is so against gunners?
i feel there is bias to use the average age as an excuse. if we use the average age to calculate, i feel the youngsters (those below 25) should not play the epl or champions league matches if they dont have sufficient credentials. use them for the fa cup or carling cup. if they r not ready to play for important matches, y play them. this is arsenal not home united. we dont need a pussy senderos crying until now cant handle drogba a real disgrace to arsenal fancy crying. shows the mentality not strong enough to play important matches.
if young then might as well play in arsenal women team. or play volleyball. how can young still play key matches say its a learning experience when we lose. these matches r so impt. whats the point of arsenal beating the shit out of pussy teams like derby etc but cant beat top teams. it is only when we compete with the best then we know where we stand. for example, arsenal record against man u at old trafford stinks. if the youngsters really have pride, even though we place more importance on chanpions league than fa cup, how can we let ourselves b raped 4-0. n worse not scoring a single goal?
to use average age as benchmark to determine our "young squad" , we might as well play all the youngsters below 21 (adult age). then i agree is young. and the average age of all the 22 1st team players is 24.2, almost 25. not exactly young.