Originally posted by sbst275:
There's no distance fare scheme in Hong Kong
juz to make it clear:
if u wanna travel cross-harbour svc in HK in HK island, make sure the direction of the bus is heading for somewhere in HK island. I f it's heading OUT of HK island, GD LUCK...
Originally posted by sbst275:
You still dun get it?15 mins headways, 80 - 90% loading you want Citaro?
Anyway, Hong Kong has MTR feeder buses... Dubbed in 'M' end prefix
Then, u tell me: IS 163 SUITABLE FOR B10M THEN???!!! ISN'T B10M SIMILAR TO CITAROS?! IF 163 SHLD NOT GET CITAROS THEN IT AIN'T GET ANY B10Ms !!!!
Don't u think so?
Originally posted by SMB128B:
juz to make it clear:if u wanna travel cross-harbour svc in HK in HK island, make sure the direction of the bus is heading for somewhere in HK island. I f it's heading OUT of HK island, GD LUCK...
No pt.. It's still more expensive than the Islands short haul svs..
Next...
Originally posted by SMB128B:
juz to make it clear:if u wanna travel cross-harbour svc in HK in HK island, make sure the direction of the bus is heading for somewhere in HK island. I f it's heading OUT of HK island, GD LUCK...
i believe the seniors have more knowledge of HK bus routes than you, dun belittle them
ACx
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Then, u tell me: IS 163 SUITABLE FOR B10M THEN???!!! ISN'T B10M SIMILAR TO CITAROS?! IF 163 SHLD NOT GET CITAROS THEN IT AIN'T GET ANY B10Ms !!!!Don't u think so?
Of course sv163 is suitable for B10Ms, the buses ran on sv163
Dun insult the B10Ms, compared to them citaros are RUBBISH, kid
ACx
Originally posted by Acx1688:i believe the seniors have more knowledge of HK bus routes than you, dun belittle them
ACx
i stayed hk 6 yrs leh...
Originally posted by SMB128B:
i stayed hk 6 yrs leh...
if you stayed HK 6 years, you have said smethin mre intelligent rather than insult the seniors...
ACx
Originally posted by Acx1688:Of course sv163 is suitable for B10Ms, the buses ran on sv163
Dun insult the B10Ms, compared to them citaros are RUBBISH, kid
ACx
They are just buses la...
But if you ask me how practical the Citaro is for day-to-day rides, I think just about any SD in the SBST fleet seems more comfortable.
The B10Ms also have narrow aisles like the Citaro, but far more seats and better aircon. And the B10M doesnt have the problem of hot rear. But its got crappy leg-room which prevents me from stretching my legs on long-haul routes, though ironically its seat facing the exit has the biggest leg-room for forward facing seats in whole fleet.
At the moment if you ask me which is the most comfortable SD that would induce a nice 40 winks I would say: K230UB (the better maintained ones) without hesitation. I love its aircon and the leg-room.
Originally posted by SMB128B:
Then, u tell me: IS 163 SUITABLE FOR B10M THEN???!!! ISN'T B10M SIMILAR TO CITAROS?! IF 163 SHLD NOT GET CITAROS THEN IT AIN'T GET ANY B10Ms !!!!Don't u think so?
Seriously the older buses are much much better than Citaro
Hong Kong has 1 fare discount scheme known as 'bus - bus transfer scheme'... It's only applicable to selected bus stops like those at Tai Lam tunnel bus stops.
Their bus fare makes it that, you've no business to take short distance on long distance bus routes. You're suppposed to take the short haul rts.
Originally posted by SBS2601D:They are just buses la...
But if you ask me how practical the Citaro is for day-to-day rides, I think just about any SD in the SBST fleet seems more comfortable.
The B10Ms also have narrow aisles like the Citaro, but far more seats and better aircon. And the B10M doesnt have the problem of hot rear. But its got crappy leg-room which prevents me from stretching my legs on long-haul routes, though ironically its seat facing the exit has the biggest leg-room for forward facing seats in whole fleet.
At the moment if you ask me which is the most comfortable SD that would induce a nice 40 winks I would say: K230UB (the better maintained ones) without hesitation. I love its aircon and the leg-room.
so tat's wat i am thinking:
CITAROS on 163, said to be not suitable...
B10M will oso be thrash on 163 prior to the above
and KUB will be the BEST OF ALL!!!
Originally posted by Acx1688:Of course sv163 is suitable for B10Ms, the buses ran on sv163
Dun insult the B10Ms, compared to them citaros are RUBBISH, kid
ACx
Originally posted by Acx1688:Of course sv163 is suitable for B10Ms, the buses ran on sv163
Dun insult the B10Ms, compared to them citaros are RUBBISH, kid
ACx
Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:
If you don't like Citaro is fine, to call it rubbish , is totally out of order. You and SmB128 are irritants and the real garbages in this forum are you and him! Perfect match for each hour. I would rather take citaro over f lousy scania and make 3s day. Do the rest of us a favour! STFU of your constant bombasting of Citaro, because no one is interested to hear your whining !
Cool down... i like citaros too...
Originally posted by sbst275:
Seriously the older buses are much much better than Citaro
Originally posted by Acx1688:Of course sv163 is suitable for B10Ms, the buses ran on sv163
Dun insult the B10Ms, compared to them citaros are RUBBISH, kid
ACx
WHEN AND IN WHAT F***ING WAY DID I EVER INSULTED THE B10Ms?! I MERELY SAID TAT B10M IS NOT SUITABLE ON 163 LIKE CITAROS, I NVR RANTED INSULTS RITE?
Look at the load and frequency of 163. I SWEAR TO GOD tat after 15-20 mins of waiting at a burning bus stop, u would like a nice cool KUB to appear in front of u rite? NOT THOSE STUFFY STRIDERS RITE? you would oso like to sit in peace without ppl cramming around u rite? WELL, B10M CAN'T DO THE JOB COZ U WILL HV PPL OWNING THE CORRIDORS DUH!
Stop owning 163 and Fernvale PIWs liddat can? i m sure old folks PIW like my mom would like direct link to TPY on 163 rite? since TPY got a lot of old folks go... do spare an thought on those poor folks and juz let 163 become a WAB svc ASAP can?
yeah, everyone is entitled to their views, but please cool down and show some restraint. thank you.
Originally posted by ^tamago^:yeah, everyone is entitled to their views, but please cool down and show some restraint. thank you.
welcome back!
i really like wat u said...
Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:
No, that's just you and the other clowns in this forum. I would recommend sbs and Smrt to stop taking in new buses , since you guys are constantly whining like pussies.New buses complain, old buses also complain! Yes , I HATE the f lousy Scania k230ubs with a big passion , do I vent them out on public forum? So please, enough of this sxxx and get back to civilised world! You guys have no idea disgrace and shame you all whiners are bringing into this hobby. Not all, but some of you guys like 128b and ace1688 are simply CMI in the eyes of the ladies! F up forum because of you guys!
yes, pls do that.
we will be very happy to have vsos and mk4s and mk3s to serve us for many more years to come.
if u don't like it, u can always move to HK.
Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:
No, that's just you and the other clowns in this forum. I would recommend sbs and Smrt to stop taking in new buses , since you guys are constantly whining like pussies.New buses complain, old buses also complain! Yes , I HATE the f lousy Scania k230ubs with a big passion , do I vent them out on public forum? So please, enough of this sxxx and get back to civilised world! You guys have no idea disgrace and shame you all whiners are bringing into this hobby. Not all, but some of you guys like 128b and ace1688 are simply CMI in the eyes of the ladies! F up forum because of you guys!
This F forum was created by you. Nobody brought up the fact that you left this place to the jungles and here you are bemoaning this fact. Humility, anyone?
Nuff said.
Anyway, it won't change many of our opinions that the Citaros are nice to look at but hardly nice in any other sense. For those who take long-haul bus rides like I do, the Citaro makes for a suffocating ride.
At the end of the day, they are just buses, as long as I can breathe, as long as the leg-room is good (if there's even a seat), as long as I dont have to resist the urge to scratch the insides of my ears, as long as my sleep is uninterrupted, any bus will do.
Most excellent SD for sleeping is the K230UB, and as for DD, it will have to be the B10TL with its sleep-inducing constant radiator roar and nice suspension.
Originally posted by Airbus330Captain:
No, that's just you and the other clowns in this forum. I would recommend sbs and Smrt to stop taking in new buses , since you guys are constantly whining like pussies.New buses complain, old buses also complain! Yes , I HATE the f lousy Scania k230ubs with a big passion , do I vent them out on public forum? So please, enough of this sxxx and get back to civilised world! You guys have no idea disgrace and shame you all whiners are bringing into this hobby. Not all, but some of you guys like 128b and ace1688 are simply CMI in the eyes of the ladies! F up forum because of you guys!
That's with your personal bias with Scania @ BNDEP.
Scania turns out to be better than Citaro for our loading condition. Though, B7RLE might turn out to be an even better option
Originally posted by sbst275:
That's with your personal bias with Scania @ BNDEP.Scania turns out to be better than Citaro for our loading condition. Though, B7RLE might turn out to be an even better option
sentosa buses...
LOL
not those B7RLE
The latest versions
Originally posted by sbst275:not those B7RLE
The latest versions
oh.
it's still similar? the lastest version being the 174 guy?
fellow bus fans; why get so upset and even harbour hatred towards some buses and quarrel among ourselves? IMO, a true bus fan is one who simply loves buses and doesn't discriminate any of them. For me, I may be disappointed with some models but I still love them simply because they are still afterall buses! Isn't it the reason why we are all gathered here in this forum?
By bearing unhappiness and hatred in your hearts only cause misery upon yourselves! Be gracious! And don't "kan bu kai".